Application Date Extended to 31 October for the GEARING-Roles Competition

Application Date Extended to 31 October for the GEARING-Roles Competition

Application date for the GEARING-Roles competition have been extended to 31 October. The GEARING-Roles (Gender Equality Actions in Research Institutions to transform Gender Roles) Project competition will be held  on the theme of Resistances to Gender Equality by Sabancı University Gender and Women’s Studies Center of Excellence (SU Gender). 5 winners will be picked for 2 prizes, namely the Research Prize and the Creative Prize.

The Research Prize
For the Research Prize, you are expected to submit short research papers (maximum 1,000 words) on the topic of resistances against gender equality. A winner will be selected from three different categories: a Bachelor, Masters and PhD. Essays must be submitted in English but please state if this is not your first language and consideration will be given to this fact in the judging.


The Creative Prize
For the Creative Prize GEARING Roles will select a winner from two categories: videos (max length 2 minutes) and cartoons/illustrations both of which must show how to counter resistances to gender equality with humour.

Entries do not need to be artistically perfect as it is the ideas and innovation behind the submission that the judges will look out for.
The competitions’ winners will get an all expenses paid trip to Estonia. Winners will also have the opportunity to build on their work and improve it with the help of experts and consultants. 

The deadline is 31 October 2021, and the winners will be announced on 15 November 2021.

For more information, please click here or send an e-mail to Olivia.iannelli@trilateralresearch.com or ilayda.ova@sabanciuniv.edu.

Article written about the successful growth of Getir

Article written about the successful growth of Getir

Tamer Çavuşgil, member of Sabancı University Board of Trustees, Cüneyt Evirgen, Director of Sabancı University Executive Development Unit (EDU), and Mithat Üner, Dean of Atılım University School of Business wrote an article to evaluate the globally successful expansion of Getir.


Published online in California Management Review Insights Journal of University of California-Berkeley Haas School of Business, the article attracts attention to the fact that as a 6-year-old digital start-up, Getir wrote a new success story in digital world, and highlights the elements underlying this success. 

The article features a special interview with Mert Salur, Chair of Getir’s Board of Directors. Cüneyt Evirgen shared the following assessments about Getir: “Getir achieved international expansion and attracted a great deal of investment from the world of venture capital to become a “unicorn” in a short period of time and gain worldwide acclaim. Another thing that makes Getir a remarkable initiative from the perspective of current business models is that it uses data analytics to a great extent.

Entrepreneurial initiatives particularly from emerging countries tend to be very interesting and didactic for the international business world. It is essential that such cases should be heard, announced and talked about so that they can encourage other entrepreneurs in addition to being examples to learn from. In addition, we find this case particularly valuable since it will contribute to strengthening the bridge between academia and the business world.”

Highlighting that Getir is a great story of entrepreneurship and self-confidence, which comes with a strong human-centric approach to the company’s management and operations promoted by the company’s shareholder, Evirgen said, “For example, the company provides private health insurance to their delivery drivers, which is unprecedented in the delivery business. As happy employees mean happy customers, Getir enhances both employee retention and customer satisfaction.”

You can access the full text of the article from the link below:

https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2021/09/getir-a-remarkable-example-of-a-digital-disrupter-from-an-emerging-market/

 

Deniz Gündoğan İbrişim from SU Gender brings the term of Anthropocene Trauma into Turkish Literature

Deniz Gündoğan İbrişim from SU Gender brings the term of Anthropocene Trauma into Turkish Literature

Deniz Gündoğan İbrişim’s EU Horizon 2020 funded project uniquely proposes a multidisciplinary conceptual and feminist methodological framework to conceptualize Anthropocene Trauma and Climate Grief from the Late-Ottoman to Modern day Turkey.

In the framework of Horizon 2020 MSCA-IF, the project entitled “Postimperial Memories, Gender and Trauma in the Anthropocene: A Change of Feminist Perspective on Turkey” (POGETA)[1] discusses that we urgently need feminist and queer approaches to discuss how we bear witness to violence, trauma, as well as how we grieve in the age of the Anthropocene. POGETA argues that much of the current narrative on the Anthropocentric age and its trauma, relies on the realm of Western and European framework from human-centered, techno-focused, and masculinist lens, overlooking the feminist and queer roots of work on the Anthropocene trauma.

The project has two main objectives. First, from an eco-ethical oriented view, it proposes a broad definition of the term “Anthropocene trauma.” Second, it proposes a novel taxonomy to discuss Anthropocene trauma through a feminist and more specifically through a queer perspective since the Late Ottoman literature. To that end, it brings a non-Western, post-Ottoman context into the Western oriented Anthropocene debates, arguing how post-Ottoman public intellectuals and contemporary Turkish novelists imagine and represent Anthropocene and its trauma in modern day Turkey and its European diasporas.

The Anthropocene Debate and What is it Good for?

The Anthropocene is the world we live in and the world we currently testify to massive ecological breakdown all around the world as well to the global Covid-19 pandemic. The Anthropocene has also become a buzzword for many a thing. A proposed geological epoch, a historical discontinuity, the human-driven disruption of the earth system, an ecological catastrophe with drastic implications on how we view our social world. As currently used, the term Anthropocene was introduced by atmospheric chemist Paul J. Crutzen in 2000. Together with the ecologist Eugene F. Stoermer, Crutzen proposed that a new epoch should be both introduced and added to the geological timescale, arguing that human activity is seen to have profound and irreparable effects on the biological, chemical, and geological processes on earth.[2] This proposition means that unprecedented human influence has led to an irreparable situation in which the earth system as a whole is “operating in a no-analogue state.[3] In the face of this unwavering suggestion, a vibrant discussion has emerged among scholars from many different fields regarding the historical origins of the Anthropocene. Does the Industrial Revolution of the eighteenth century and the invention of the stream engine mark the beginning of the Anthropocene? Or did the invention of agriculture around 8,000 BC trigger a new epoch? More recently, what can we find and thus theorize with the explosion of the first atomic bomb in July 1945, when techno-scientific progress prepared for the atomic age and sparked the “Great Acceleration” in human communication since the post-war boom period? With all these layers of the birth of the Anthropocene, its origins for scholars and artists who work at the intersection of science, environment, arts and humanities remain still inconclusive and a decision on whether the Anthropocene should be officially recognized as a period, epoch, or age in the geological timescale has yet to be made by the International Commission on Stratigraphy.

While the term has been championed by a wide diversity of people, it has also faced a profound critique from environmental and social historians. For instance, “In the Climate of History: Four Theses,” the historian Dipesh Chakrabarty examines the idea of the Anthropocene in the context of postcolonial history, raising fundamental questions about how we think historically in an era when human and geological timescales are colliding, partly challenging the term from a postcolonial perspective.[4] Another critique of the term derives from the concern that the Anthropocene concept “naturalizes” human’s impact on the earth. But what does this mean? Essentially, that by saying that this is the epoch of humans, we are suggest that all humans are the cause. Thereby, we, once again, perpetuate the (Western) masculinist idea that humans are separate from nature, and that either we get back to it or we, as the rational bounded human subject, rise above it gloriously.

Taking these claims into consideration, POGETA suggests that Anthropocene remains critically important and timely provocation, a vexed but a key concept to explain the gravity of our current ecological situation. The project suggests that with the increasing currency of the Anthropocene era, new ways of coping with Anthropocene distress and Anthropocene trauma have emerged. For example, as E. Ann Kaplan proposes, the concept of “pre-traumatic stress syndrome” describes how cultural representations of accelerated environmental degradation generate “climate trauma,” which is accompanied by its own psychological condition.[5] Pre-Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PreTSS) is but one of several mental health conditions being theorized in the humanities and social sciences as a result of the dramatic psychological impasse of climate change and the environmental desecration resulting from it. In a similar vein, concepts, such as “eco-anxiety” or “eco-grief” have been described by the American Psychological Association in 2017 as “a chronic fear of environmental doom” in the age of the Anthropocene. In particular, anxiety around climate crisis and environmental disruption has become increasingly pervasive that in November 2019 the leaders of more than forty psychological associations from all around the world signed a resolution at a conference in Lisbon acknowledging that climate change poses a serious threat to mental health and signaling a genuine desire to deal with the problem (American Psychological Association, 2019). 

These advances have shown that the proposed geologic epoch of the Anthropocene is a distressing process, if not altogether a traumatic one, in which humans strongly question their secure and familiar modes of dwelling in the world.  Humans also question the concept of care as the practice of interdependency, admitting their vulnerabilities as humans, animals, and other living organisms of the Anthropocene are all intertwined with one another. Thus, POGETA acknowledges and reflects on these manifold theorizations and manifestations, which remains largely unspoken and unrecognized in Turkey.

Revisiting the Cannon through a dialogue between Gender and the Anthropocene

Understanding humans as a geological agent does not necessarily mean to overlook the differences of gender, race, affluence, health, including the inequalities in the access to technology, lifestyles and forms of consumption. On the contrary, it means to take into account the dependency of humans on many nonhuman bodies and entities, ranging from certain species (e.g. animals, plants, bacteria, crops, insects) to landscapes, water cycles, or material resources. The Anthropocene also raises the question of responsibility for the changing state of the Earth planet. In so doing, it allows us to rethink about the “Anthropos” of the Anthropocene, the ideal image of “Man” as a rational subject endowed with language; hence, the critique of the universalist image of Man as the measure of all things and of liberal human exceptionalism. Within this framework, several prominent scholars of gender and feminism have written about the intersections between gender and the Anthropocene. For instance, Claire Colebrook argues that there is no singular Anthropocene, but many, when she asks, ‘whose Anthropocene?’[6] (2019: 10, original emphasis). Colebrook answers her own question with such ‘An Anthropocene feminism […] might ask for whom this stratum becomes definitive of the human’ (2019: 10, original emphasis).

In light of these insights, POGETA provocatively revisits some of the canonical texts in Turkish and its European diasporic literature and closely examines the manifestation of trauma (in particular environmental and gendered) which, the project claims, integral to the biopolitics of the Anthropocene. By revisiting texts from authors such as Ahmet Hamdi Tanpinar, Yaşar Kemal, Orhan Pamuk, Sevim Burak, Leyla Erbil, Latife Tekin, and Emine Sevgi Özdamar, the project engages with feminist and queer approaches and unorthodox narrative devices that can provide the reader with critical tools to reconceptualize trauma and grief in the Anthropocene as well as to launch new ways of working through collective eco-melancholia and its global impact in the age of the Anthropocene.

POGETA argues that in the proposed texts, the representation of the Anthropocene and its complex and multifaceted trauma disrupts prevailing heterosexist discursive, institutional articulations of sexuality and nature, the making of the modern world and the capitalist pursuit of “progress.” From and within this disruption, the texts also encourage the reader to reimagine evolutionary processes, eco-ethical interactions, and environmental politics in Turkey and beyond in the age of the Anthropocene. Thus, POGETA invites scholars, readers and reseearchers to reflect on feminist and queer approaches to think more ecologically, in other words, to consider as trauma and grief as complex biological, environmental technological, and political assemblages rather than as either purely discursive or materially determined processes in Turkish literature and beyond.


Being the first of its kind that simultaneously acknowledges and transcends current environmental concerns and one that relates back to gender, race, ethnicity, and class in Turkey and its European diasporas, POGETA is highly innovative. It thus contributes to significant, multidisciplinary discussion concerning environmental, psychoanalytical and historiographical investigations of Anthropocene trauma in post-imperial Turkey, combining perspectives, which have so far been less explored, i.e. feminist/queer, literary and environmental studies. The project also corresponds well with 2020 EU policies regarding environment and climate action and the Horizon 2020 Work Program and offers a rigorous reading with regard to literary, psychoanalytical and physical response to our dire environment predicament.


[1] Project Coordinator: Deniz Gündoğan İbrişim, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Postdoctoral Fellow, SU Gender; project supervisor: Hülya Adak, SU Gender Director.

[2] See Crutzen and Stoermer’s 2000 study, “The “Anthropocene” in Global Change Newsletter.

[3] See Crutzen’s and Steffen’s seminal article “How long have we been in an Anthropocene era?” in

Climatic Change. The emphasis in the original.

[4] See Chakrabarty’s 2009 essay “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” In Critical Inquiry 35, no. 2.

[5] See Ann E. Kaplan’s 2016 book Climate Trauma: Foreseeing the Future in Dystopian Film and Fiction.

[6] See Claire Colebrook’s 2019 seminal work Climate and Literature.

Project of Meltem Elitaş and her research group is featured on the cover of ACS Journal

Project of Meltem Elitaş and her research group is featured on the cover of ACS Journal

The study entitled “Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods and Technologies for On-Site Plant–Pathogen Diagnostics” carried out by Meltem Elitaş, member of Sabancı University Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences (FENS), and her research group is featured on the cover of ACS Agricultural Science & Technology Journal.

MeltemElitaş

Providing information about the study, Meltem Elitaş said the following: “Global climate change has drastically affected agricultural production. Moreover, pandemics, wars, and rapid decreases in natural resources point to the emerging need for famine prevention by increasing smart agriculture and food production and decreasing food loss and waste. To achieve this, plant and food diseases should be detected early and rapidly treated. From this perspective, we focus on recent, simple, and instrument-free, nucleic acid extraction techniques, which are capable of isolating high-quality nucleic acids from plant tissues, to be either easily used in the field or simply integrated into various nucleic acid detection platforms or sensors.”

A joint project of Sabancı University and ASELSAN receives TÜBİTAK support

A joint project of Sabancı University and ASELSAN receives TÜBİTAK support

A project in which Emre Özlü (member of Sabancı University Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences (FENS)), is the Principal Investigator, and Kemal Kılıç (member of FENS) is the Researcher, submitted jointly with ASELSAN, the biggest company in defense industry in Turkey is entitled to receive support within the framework of TÜBİTAK 1505 University-Industry Collaboration program.

emre özlü

The project is entitled “Development of a System to Establish Control over Mechanical Part Production in Defense Industry” and will be carried out at FENS for a period of 24 months. The aim of the project is to develop a smart decision support system for procurement operations of precise and complex mechanical parts used in defense industry.

Thanks to this system, procurement processes will be supported by a smart decision-making approach, enhancing efficiency of procurement operations and matching suppliers with projects that fit their capabilities to strengthen their specialization.

With the cost-oriented procurement decision-making support system, a classification model that also considers infrastructure capability and success scores of side-industry companies in defense sector will be developed for the first time in Turkey.

Öznur Taştan selected to the Management Committee of exRNA-PATH Action of COST

Öznur Taştan selected to the Management Committee of exRNA-PATH Action of COST

Öznur Taştan, member of Sabancı University Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences (FENS), has been selected to the Management Committee of exRNA-PATH Action of COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology), which is a funding organization aiming to ensure cooperation in science and technology across Europe, and coordinate nationally-funded research projects at the European level.

ÖznurTaştan

COST enables coordinators of nationally-funded research projects to be involved in cooperation networks across Europe. Öznur Taştan, member of FENS, took part as one of the secondary proposers of the action entitled “CA20110 - RNA communication across kingdoms: new mechanisms and strategies in pathogen control”. After the action was accepted, she started to act as a member of the Management Committee of the action. Öznur Taştan will also act as the grant awards coordinator of the action.

Öznur Taştan provided the following information regarding the exRNA-PATH Cost Action: “A new frontier in RNA biology has emerged in the last decade with findings that RNA can act outside of cells to transmit information between cells, organisms, and species as a form of communication.  Pathogens also exploit extracellular RNAs (exRNAs) to enable their infections and exRNAs are associated with numerous infectious diseases in both animals and plants. However, there are large gaps in knowledge on exRNA mechanisms, such as how exRNAs are selected for export, how they are trafficked outside of the cell, how they integrate into a functional pathway in a recipient, and how pathogens exploit these mechanisms. The COST action entitled “RNA communication across kingdoms: new mechanisms and strategies in pathogen control” aims to advance the emerging exRNA field through bridging researchers in the exRNA field. The action aims to create new synergies both among scientists and between scientists and industry for innovative solutions to medical, societal and environmental challenges in order to understand exRNAs role in disease and their curing potential.”

SUSAM, our Arts Workshop Building, was inaugurated

SUSAM, our Arts Workshop Building, was inaugurated

SUSAM Building, which will serve as an Arts Workshop under Sabancı University Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, was inaugurated with a ceremony. Delivering a speech at the inauguration ceremony, Güler Sabancı, the Founding Chair of Sabancı University Board of Trustees, said they raised good students for the world of arts, adding that the workshops in the building would be home to successful projects.

SusamAçılışı-1

SUSAM Building of Sabancı University Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences located in the University’s campus in Tuzla was inaugurated with an official ceremony. The ceremony was attended by Güler Sabancı, the Founding Chair of Sabancı University Board of Trustees, Professor Yusuf Leblebici, President of Sabancı University, Professor Meltem Müftüler-Baç, Dean of Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS), Selim Birsel and Wieslaw Zaremba, members of FASS, in addition to faculty members and students of Visual Arts and Visual Communication Design program.

SusamAçılışı-2

Güler Sabancı: We raise successful students for the world of arts

Pointing out that they started preparations for the SUSAM Building before the pandemic, Güler Sabancı, the Founding Chair of Sabancı University Board of Trustees, said the following: “Today is an exciting day for me. I sincerely thank everyone who put their efforts in this project. We always wanted Visual Arts and Visual Communication Design program of Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences to have their workshops in a place of their own. During the first years of Sabancı University, it felt like we were swimming in uncharted waters with such a different program, but our program became a very successful one thanks to its students, who eventually become artists, and our faculty members who raise them. A beautiful example of this fact is that exhibitions of artists who happened to be in this program are currently on view at the Sakıp Sabancı Museum. I would like to thank our faculty members who raise successful students for the world of arts, and I believe our arts workshops will be home to very successful projects.”

SusamAçılışı-3

Yusuf Leblebici: We would like this program to set an example for other universities.

Highlighting that they had a program that should set an example for other universities, Yusuf Leblebici, President of Sabancı University, said the following: “Inauguration of this building is a very nice development for us. Visual Arts and Visual Communication Design is one of our most valuable and special programs. It is a program that no other university has, and it makes us really proud for its achievements. Going forward, we would like Visual Arts and Visual Communication Design program to be available in other universities.”

SusamAçılışı-4

Professor Meltem Müftüler-Baç, Dean of Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, said SUSAM building was already in use nearly for 1 year. She continued: “We actually opened SUSAM last year. Our students and faculty members have been working there for 1 year. However, we did not have any opportunity to inaugurate it officially due to the pandemic. We are very glad to be here today all together for the inauguration ceremony.”

Selim Birsel, member of FASS, said although their unit was small, they carried out important projects. Birsel said: “I would like to thank everyone who contributed to the establishment of this building. You can see here examples of some projects accomplished last year. Although we are a small unit, we realize big projects.”

Güler Sabancı, visits the Composite Technologies Center of Excellence

Güler Sabancı, visits the Composite Technologies Center of Excellence

Güler Sabancı, the Founding Chair of the Board of Trustees of Sabancı University, has paid a visit to the Composite Technologies Center of Excellence in Teknopark Istanbul.

GülerSabancıKTMMziyaret1

Güler Sabancı came together with staff members of Kordsa and Sabancı University Integrated Manufacturing Technologies Research and Application Center (SU IMC) within the CTCE. After visiting the laboratories, Güler Sabancı received updates about the current work carried out in the center. During her visit, Güler Sabancı was accompanied by Cenk Alper, CEO of Sabancı Holding, Yusuf Leblebici, President of Sabancı University, Cevdet Alemdar, Sabancı Holding Industry Group President, Ali Çalışkan, CEO of Kordsa, and Mehmet Yıldız, Sabancı University’s Vice President for Research and Development.

GülerSabancıKTMMziyaret2

Highlighting the importance of industry-university collaboration, Güler Sabancı said the following: “This is a place that has always excited me since it was established. Kordsa has a special place in my career. I was the CEO of Kordsa for 14 years. Today, Kordsa and Sabancı University are in a very fruitful cooperation. We set a good example of industry-university collaboration in Turkey. I have observed that very good work is done here in our Center. You have a beautiful mission and everyone makes very valuable contributions towards this mission. I extend my sincere thanks to everyone for their work and contributions.”

GülerSabancıKTMMziyaret3

Yusuf Leblebici, President of Sabancı University, said they had a unique center in Turkey, and added the following: “You cannot find many examples of such an industry-university collaboration model in the world, let alone Turkey. This place is a source of pride for us. Your work is of great importance to us. I would like to thank you all so much for your dedication. As Sabancı University, we are always by your side.”

GülerSabancıKTMMziyaret4

Cenk Alper, CEO of Sabancı Holding CEO stated they had high expectations for the center. He continued: “We have carried this Center to a very good point so far. We have reached a maturity level, so the Center can progress much faster than before. What we wish for Sabancı University and Kordsa is that they achieve much greater projects thanks to their collaboration. I believe they will realize projects with a global impact.”

Dr. Jillian Grennan was hosted in the CEF seminar entitled “Artificial Intelligence and Asset Management”

Dr. Jillian Grennan was hosted in the CEF seminar entitled “Artificial Intelligence and Asset Management”

In its online seminar series initiated during the pandemic, Sabancı University Center of Excellence in Finance (CEF), founded under the sponsorhip of Akbank, hosted Dr. Jillian Grennan, a prominent scholar in the field of finance, from Duke University.

cef_grennan_konuk_oldu

During the seminar entitled “Artificial Intelligence and Asset Management” held on Thursday, August 12, 2021, Dr. Grennan shared her assessments:

Artificial intelligence is a powerful form of automation that improves prediction and programs machines to act more like humans. As robots or new software have replaced jobs requiring low- or medium-level skills, artificial intelligence is expected to play a role in labor markets, particularly high-skill jobs. A study that we carried out with a focus on this expectation as far as financial analysts are concerned indicates that analysts who manage portfolios that are more vulnerable to impacts of artificial intelligence are guided to rather soft skills and some of them even quit their jobs. Most of the analysts who quit are those with a strong power of prediction and they go to non-research jobs. Although the fact that analysts’ focus has shifted to soft skills helped improve financial forecasts, the average salaries of analysts tend to decrease since the impact of artificial intelligence results in devaluation of analysts’ outputs.”

Jillian Grennan is an Assistant Professor of Finance at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business. In the current academic year, she acts as a visiting professor at University of California Berkeley Law Faculty and Haas School of Business. Dr. Grennan’s academic interests span finance, law, and innovation. Her research focuses on intangible value creation and emphasizes the role informal and formal governance systems have in its creation.  She offers novel computational techniques for quantifying the value of corporate culture and sustainability objectives.

You can watch the seminar with Jillian Grennan, moderated by Yiğit Atılgan, faculty member at Sabancı University from the link below.

Sabancı University Among 46 Universities Participating in UniSAFE Survey

Sabancı University Among 46 Universities Participating in UniSAFE Survey

Under the leadership of Sabancı University Gender and Women's Studies Center of Excellence (SU Gender), our university will take part in UniSAFE, EU-funded project on gender-based violence, which includes 46 universities from 15 European countries.

Expected to be among the largest of its kind, the survey’s field research will be conducted by Hülya Adak and Ayşe Gül Altınay from SU Gender.  The survey will be implemented from January to April 2022 among participants’ staff, undergraduate and graduate students, and could potentially be one of the largest of its kind to provide measurable evidence of gender-based violence in European research and performing organisations.

“Despite the growing interest in gender-based violence in academia, it remains an under-developed field of knowledge and policy-making in the European Research Area. Generating in-depth data on a large scale will not only serve to raise awareness, it will also provide a solid basis to develop tools for universities and research organisations to eradicate gender-based violence” says Sofia Strid, UniSAFE scientific coordinator.

The first step within this project will be to gather measurable evidence on the prevalence of gender-based violence in European universities and understand how it relates to its determinants and consequences. The research examines experiences and related attitudes and behaviours among staff and students from the participating universities and research organisations. This quantitative study will be completed by 60 individual interviews with researchers at higher risk of gender-based violence and case studies on institutional responses at selected research performing organisations.

The next step will be to translate this solid and comparable data into recommendations and guidelines for all universities and organisations willing to implement radical change in preventing gender-base violence, protecting their students and staff, prosecuting the perpetrators, and providing services to their victims.

The aggregated data for this survey will be available in July 2022.

The UniSAFE project thanks the following universities and research organisations for their active participation:

  1. University of Namur (BE)
  2. University of Ghent (BE)
  3. University of Liège (BE)
  4. Institute of Czech Literature Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  5. University of Ostrava (CZ)
  6. West Bohemian University (CZ)
  7. Tampere University (FI)
  8. University of Lapland (FI)
  9. University of Helsinki (FI)
  10. International Space University (FR)
  11. CNRS (FR)
  12. University of Paris-Est (FR)
  13. University of Cologne (DE)
  14. Technical University of Dresden (DE)
  15. Forschungszentrum Jülich (Helmholtz Association) (DE)
  16. University of Lübeck (DE)
  17. FH Aachen (DE)
  18. University of Akureyri (IS)
  19. University of Reykjavik (IS)
  20. University of Iceland (IS)
  21. TU Dublin (IE)
  22. Maynooth University (IE)
  23. University of Cagliari (IT)
  24. CNR (IT)
  25. University of Turin (IT)
  26. Vilnius Art Academy (LT)
  27. Vilnius University (LT)
  28. Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
  29. Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (PL)
  30. Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (PL)
  31. Institute of Nuclear Physics (PL)
  32. Union University (RS)
  33. University of Belgrade (RS)
  34. University of the Basque Country (ES)
  35. University of Granada (ES)
  36. University Jaume I (ES)
  37. University of Deusto (ES)
  38. University of Gävle (SE)
  39. Halmstad University (SE)
  40. University West (SE)
  41. Ozyegin University (TR)
  42. Sabanci University (TR)
  43. Middle East Technical University (Ankara) (TR)
  44. Babraham Institute (UK)
  45. University of Warwick (UK)
  46. Brunel University (UK)
Subscribe to